[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debugging and source code
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: Debugging and source code |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 2017 03:58:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 06:54:30PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:22:48PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> You can always get the right source code by running “guix build -S
> >> package”.
> >>
> >> OTOH having the source directly in the “debug” (or “source”?) output as
> >> you suggest would be more convenient.
> >>
> >> The only downside is the extra size of the “debug” output. Most of the
> >> time that’s a price people are happy to pay when they are installing the
> >> “debug” output. But sometimes maybe not.
> >
> > How about a :debug-full switch?
>
> There’s no switch, only a “debug” output.
yes, yes. I meant a "debug-full" output.
--
- Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/25
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/25
- Re: Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/25
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/25
- Re: Debugging and source code,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: Debugging and source code, Chris Marusich, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/26
- Re: Debugging and source code, Pjotr Prins, 2017/01/28
- Re: Debugging and source code, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/30
- Re: Debugging and source code, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/01/30
Re: Debugging and source code, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/01/25