[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Aug 2016 09:46:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat 06 Aug 2016 09:52, Andreas Enge <address@hidden> writes:
> I am not very happy about such a policy; if I sign a commit, I am only
> signing my commit, and not all of its history
For what it's worth, this is not quite true. The SHA1 hashes of parent
commits are part of the commit object itself, so if you sign a commit
you are also signing its history.
Andy
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, (continued)
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andy Wingo, 2016/08/04
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/04
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andy Wingo, 2016/08/05
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/05
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andy Wingo, 2016/08/05
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/05
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Mark H Weaver, 2016/08/05
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/05
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andy Wingo, 2016/08/08
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andreas Enge, 2016/08/06
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/08/07
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/04
- Re: core-updates merged!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/06
- Re: core-updates merged!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/10
- Re: core-updates merged!, Manolis Ragkousis, 2016/08/13
- Core-updates is ready for your patches!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/13
- Re: core-updates merged!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/08