guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] doc: Add a section on naming conventions for font packages.


From: Andreas Enge
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Add a section on naming conventions for font packages.
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:27:45 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

I finally got around to word Ludovic's suggestion on names for font packages,
which I think we agreed upon. Corrections are welcome.

Andreas


* doc/guix.texi (Fonts): New section.
  (Package naming): Reference the new section.
---
 doc/guix.texi | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index c0b9668..11ae2e9 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -4745,6 +4745,7 @@ needed is to review and apply the patch.
 * Version Numbers::      When the name is not enough.
 * Python Modules::       Taming the snake.
 * Perl Modules::         Little pearls.
+* Fonts::                Fond of fonts.
 @end menu
 
 @node Software Freedom
@@ -4796,6 +4797,8 @@ already part of the official project name.  But 
@pxref{Python
 Modules} and @ref{Perl Modules} for special rules concerning modules for
 the Python and Perl languages.
 
+Font package names are handled differently, @pxref {Fonts}.
+
 
 @node Version Numbers
 @subsection Version Numbers
@@ -4871,6 +4874,43 @@ are also prepended by @code{perl-}.  Such modules tend 
to have the word
 prefix.  For instance, @code{libwww-perl} becomes @code{perl-libwww}.
 
 
address@hidden Fonts
address@hidden Fonts
+
+For fonts that are in general not installed by a user for typesetting
+purposes, or that are distributed as part of a larger software package,
+we rely on the general packaging rules for software; for instance, this
+applies to the fonts delivered as part of the X.Org system or fonts that
+are part of TeX Live.
+
+To make it easier for a user to search for fonts, names for other packages
+containing only fonts are constructed as follows, independently of the
+upstream package name.
+
+The name of a package containing only one font family starts with
address@hidden; it is followed by the foundry name and a dash @code{-}
+if the foundry is known, and the font family name, in which spaces are
+replaced by dashes (and as usual, all upper case letters are transformed
+to lower case).
+For example, the Gentium font family by SIL is packaged under the name
address@hidden
+
+For a package containing several font families, the name of the collection
+is used in the place of the font family name.
+For instance, the Liberation fonts consist of three families,
+Liberation Sans, Liberation Serif and Liberation Mono.
+These could be packaged separately under the names
address@hidden and so on; but as they are distributed together
+under a common name, we prefer to package them together as
address@hidden
+
+In the case where several formats of the same font family or font collection
+are packaged separately, a short form of the format, prepended by a dash,
+is added to the package name. We use @code{-ttf} for TrueType fonts,
address@hidden {-otf} for OpenType fonts and @code{-type1} for PostScript Type 1
+fonts.
+
+
 
 @node Bootstrapping
 @section Bootstrapping
-- 
2.1.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]