[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Font package naming convention
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: Font package naming convention |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:22:59 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Andreas, could you take a look at updating the guidelines? Do you want
> to handle the rename of existing font packages as well?
Indeed I had volunteered, but not found the time. I revolunteer ;-)
Andreas
- Re: Font package naming convention, (continued)
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/01
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/02
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/03
- Re: Font package naming convention, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/19
- Re: Font package naming convention,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Font package naming convention, Alex Kost, 2014/11/20
- [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Alex Kost, 2014/11/23
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add 'font-liberation'., Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/24