02/02: website: keep-failed bug blog post: Clarify the impact of protected hardlinks.

[Leo Famulari]

lfam pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix-artwork.

commit b6b0c5c307f6722bb25146123a1af6aef06597b9
Author: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
AuthorDate: Thu Mar 18 14:08:12 2021 -0400

    website: keep-failed bug blog post: Clarify the impact of protected 
hardlinks.
    
    * website/posts/keep-failed.md: Clarify.
---
 website/posts/keep-failed.md | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/website/posts/keep-failed.md b/website/posts/keep-failed.md
index 8d70999..f2cc6fd 100644
--- a/website/posts/keep-failed.md
+++ b/website/posts/keep-failed.md
@@ -13,10 +13,11 @@ It does _not_ affect multi-user setups where `guix-daemon` 
runs on a
 separate machine and is accessed over the network via
 `GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET`, as is customary on [cluster
 setups](https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2017/11/installing-guix-on-a-cluster/).
-Machines where the Linux [protected
+Exploitation is more difficult, but not impossible, on machines where
+the Linux [protected
 hardlinks](https://sysctl-explorer.net/fs/protected_hardlinks/) feature
-is enabled, which is common, are also unaffected — this is the case when
-the contents of `/proc/sys/fs/protected_hardlinks` are `1`.
+is enabled, which is common — this is the case when the contents of
+`/proc/sys/fs/protected_hardlinks` are `1`.
 
 # Vulnerability