Re: GPT-4 knows Guile! :)

[Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide]

<tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:

> which has tried to be free (in both senses). For images, there is
> Stable Diffusion (disclaimer:I don't know much about them). For
> raw data, there's Common Crawl [3], which is Stable Diffusion's

Stable diffusion has one of the most evil licenses I’ve read till now:
using its images seems to be allowed for almost all proprietary uses,
but illegal for free culture use. See the explicit questions about that
here: https://github.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/issues/131

A license that makes its output only usable for proprietary creations
but not for free culture is like the polar opposite of the GPL or CC
by-sa: making a tool that gives proprietary creations an advantage over
Free Culture.

Some quotes:

> Does this mean that the CreativeML Open RAIL-M license makes output
> from the model incompatible with copyleft Free Culture and Free
> Software licenses, so it would for example be illegal to use any of
> the output in Wikipedia? Is there legal uncertainty about that?
…
> The first thing to say is that this license is about as far away from
> open source as it could possibly get.
…
>> "No use of the output can contravene any provision as stated in the 
>> License.".

> A Japanese lawyer I know told me that, in general terms, releasing
> output under the CC-BY could be a violation of the license if such a
> provision exists. (* He is not familiar with this license and has not
> reviewed it in detail)

No answer from the developers.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature