[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: assume -s
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: assume -s |
Date: |
04 Sep 2003 00:17:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
Kevin> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> Thanks. This was discussed in October 2002 on the list, and there
>> seemed a pretty clear consensus in favour, so I'll apply this soon.
Kevin> Does "guile -- foo.scm" do the same as "guile foo.scm"?
No. Personally I think this is useful. Does it contravene some GNU
standard though?
(If the script uses getopt, though, I wonder if something like
"guile foo.scm -s switch -- arg" works? I'd guess it does.)
Neil
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2003/09/01
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Kevin Ryde, 2003/09/02
- Re: PATCH: assume -s,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Kevin Ryde, 2003/09/03
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Paul Jarc, 2003/09/04
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Robert Uhl, 2003/09/05
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Kevin Ryde, 2003/09/09
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Paul Jarc, 2003/09/10
- Re: PATCH: assume -s, Neil Jerram, 2003/09/04