[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:38:51 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
Dr. Peter Ivanyi <address@hidden> wrote:
> In this case can I also point out that the module definition is different
> in guile compared to these (and maybe some other) scheme systems. This
If SRFI-7 could be extended to include some features to tell you what
platform and implementation you are running on, then I think this is
possible. Anyone got opinions on that? Any plans for SRFI-7 in guile?
For now, I'm using a bizarre concoction of many small files to emulate
what should happen.
--
MJR http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ IM: address@hidden
This is my home web site. This for Jabber Messaging.
How's my writing? Let me know via any of my contact details.
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, MJ Ray, 2003/04/28
- Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], tomas, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Thamer Al-Harbash, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Ken Anderson, 2003/04/29
Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Robert Uhl, 2003/04/30
Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Thamer Al-Harbash, 2003/04/30
Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], tomas, 2003/04/30