[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mutating C binding arguments?
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: mutating C binding arguments? |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:11:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 08:06:04PM +0200, Michael Livshin wrote:
: the proper Scheme way to have multiple results from a function
: is to use call-with-values & values.
:
: they are not reflected in the C interface now. perhaps they should
: be.
Do you mean that I can't invoke "values" from C functions?
Lars J
- mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/03
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/03
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/04
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/05
- Re: mutating C binding arguments?, Michael Livshin, 2000/10/05