[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plans
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: plans |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:42:22 +0100 |
Hey Kevin,
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 09:16 +1100, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > The other thing that still bothers me are the generics. I'd like for it
> > to be possible to load the guile libraries without making generic
> > functions, without importing them into your namespace. Thoughts on this?
>
> Having been using the plain functions in the guile-gtk, getting the
> same would seem like a good thing to me. But I'm not sure if it's
> good to have two styles of interface. The generics aren't too
> terrible, maybe everyone should be made to use them.
The longer names, e.g. gtk-bin-add, are also there. They're also really
cheap to make, and they help in figuring out what operations are
supported on a type (gtk-window- TAB in the repl). The generics are just
abbreviations, basically.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: plans, Kevin Ryde, 2006/12/02
- Re: plans,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: plans, David Pirotte, 2006/12/05