[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux
From: |
Andreas Rottmann |
Subject: |
Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:11:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden>
>> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:58:39 +0200
>> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden> (Greg Troxel's message of
>> "07 Oct 2004 12:51:11 -0400")
>> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>
>> Yes, it's true that the new g-wrap isn't a drop-in replacement, even
>> with the compat layer, which is pretty complete now (I was able to
>> build GnuCash with it), since it doesn't support GLib 1.2. I'm
>> thinking about changing that and ship a GLib 1.2 wrapper, but I'm
>> somewhat hesistant due to the code duplication this involves.
>
> As long as it can be installed in parallel -- with any packaging
> system -- which I think implies a different name, e.g. gwrap2, it's
> fine not to be compatible. But the old one will live a long time.
>
The problem is that parallel-installability is not as easy as one
might think - the underlying problem is that both the old and the new
g-wrap provide the Guile module (g-wrap). If you know of a way how to
solve that, I'd like to hear it. Instead, I'm trying to make it
compatible (well, not *really* compatible, but compatible enough for
GnuCash, which is apparently the only user of the old G-Wrap).
>> Hmm, can't do much about that; if I get the new g-wrap to support GLib
>> 1.2, maybe the netbsd pkgsrc should be updated.
>
> From the pkgsrc point of view, the new g-wrap would get a g-wrap2
> package, and one could install both.
>
See above.
>> Well, the arch thing shouldn't keep you from trying - there are
>> recent tarballs of both G-Wrap and guile-gnome available.
>
> I have seen that on the list, and will try again - I'm also low on
> Copious Spare Time.
>
> But, according to
>
> http://home.gna.org/guile-gnome/download/
>
> they aren't tarballs :-), and I don't see anything on the developer page
> either. Even if the download link were just a server-generated page
> with what's in the directory it woudl be nicer for the casual user.
>
Perhaps we should do like Gnome-Python and provide publically
advertized (on gnome-lang-bindings) prereleases. Wingo?
Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann | address@hidden | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
Make free software, not war!
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andy Wingo, 2004/10/05
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/10/05
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Greg Troxel, 2004/10/07
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/10/07
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Greg Troxel, 2004/10/07
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux,
Andreas Rottmann <=
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Greg Troxel, 2004/10/07
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andy Wingo, 2004/10/10
- Re: g-wrap parallel installability part deux, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/10/10