Re: [PATCH] add language/wisp to Guile?

[Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide]

Hi,

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>> Why should Wisp be a separate package when other SRFIs are made part
>>> of Guile?  Your point about maintenance and evolving applies equally
>>> to other SRFIs.
>>
>> That’s a good point.  Making it available as (srfi srfi-119) would make
>> sense I guess.  I need to take a closer look…
>
> That’s where the documentation and tests are located:
>
> - test-suite/tests/srfi-119.test
> - doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi::5666:@node SRFI-119
>
> The language implementation is in (language wisp) because that’s in the
> language search path.

Given the complexities in changing the way languages are handled (the
required discussions, as we’ve seen in the not yet resolved discussion),
would you be OK with keeping the question about adding support for
SRFI-119 to Guile separate from the general discussion about language
handling?

Are there improvements needed besides the ones I did thanks to the
review by Maxime or is this good to go?

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature