[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile and elisp
From: |
Grant Rettke |
Subject: |
Re: guile and elisp |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:32:55 -0500 |
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> What I meant is that Scheme’s disjoint boolean type should be considered
> the Right Thing. I’d rather keep it really disjoint, at the cost of
> weaker/less trivial interop, than going the elisp road too far.
Are you guys discussing something like a foreign function interface
for Scheme to Elisp and vice versa?
Sorry for the dense question as from what I have read it started very
technical, and I am wondering what is the overarching vision.