[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:26:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
I was under the impression that Windows users would often prefer
software that requires “only” MinGW, as opposed to the more heavyweight
Cygwin. From that point of view a MinGW port seems to be useful,
especially if Guile does part of the OS abstraction job that Cygwin
does.
I agree that portability tricks should primarily be directed to Gnulib.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work, (continued)
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work, Peter Brett, 2010/03/22
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work, Neil Jerram, 2010/03/22
Re: Reconsideration of MinGW work,
Ludovic Courtès <=
Re:Reconsideration of MinGW work, carlo\.bramix, 2010/03/21
Re:Reconsideration of MinGW work, carlo\.bramix, 2010/03/22