[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stack overflow
|
From: |
Mikael Djurfeldt |
|
Subject: |
Re: stack overflow |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:20:15 +0100 |
2008/2/17, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
> Isn't it be possible to catch SIGSEGV, and check whether it was
> caused by overflow?
Couldn't that leave the interpreter in a strange state so that one
would need to quit and restart? The current scheme allows the
interpreter to continue to run after error.
Re: stack overflow, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/02/16
- Re: stack overflow,
Mikael Djurfeldt <=