[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srfi-18 requirements
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: srfi-18 requirements |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:33:49 -0500 |
> > For join-thread, sure. What about scm_join_thread? Sorry if I'm
> > being obtuse, but my understanding was that you didn't want anything
> > like scm_join_thread_timed and that changing the signature of
> > scm_join_thread was out of the question. (Or should this enhancement
> > only be exposed in Scheme?)
>
> Write scm_join_thread_timed(), which implements all the new behaviour.
> Map that to join-thread in Scheme - then that's still back compatible,
> because the added args are optional. Then rewrite scm_join_thread()
> as a trivial function that just calls scm_join_thread_timed().
>
> See scm_catch_with_pre_unwind_handler() and scm_catch() in throw.c for
> a similar example.
>
> Does that sound OK to you?
Quite! Thanks.
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/02/02
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/02/05
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/02/07
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/02/07
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/02/11
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/02/19
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/02/19
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/02/21
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/02/21
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/02/24
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Julian Graham, 2008/02/24
- Re: srfi-18 requirements, Neil Jerram, 2008/02/24