[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n, gettext support
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: i18n, gettext support |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:37:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> I don't understand. If that's forbidden, d*gettext will tell you that,
It's forbidden. dcgettext will not do what people expect when they try to use
it.
> why add an extra check?
In order to tell people that they are writing buggy code when they write
(gettext string LC_ALL). There's no difference between LC_ALL and -761 in
this respect: both are invalid.
Bruno
- Re: i18n, gettext support, (continued)
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/04
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Kevin Ryde, 2004/09/06
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/07
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Kevin Ryde, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/07
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/07
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Kevin Ryde, 2004/09/07
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Kevin Ryde, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/08
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/09
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/15
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Marius Vollmer, 2004/09/21
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Bruno Haible, 2004/09/22
- Re: i18n, gettext support, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/02
Re: i18n, gettext support, Kevin Ryde, 2004/09/01