[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables
From: |
rm |
Subject: |
Re: Smart variables, dumb variables |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:06:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:35:29PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> >
> > > Read-onlyness should be a property of a variable that can be detected
> > > by the compiler so we wouldn't want to bury it only in the setter, I'd
> > > say.
> >
> > For some kind of static integrity checking?
>
> I had in mind that the compiler could use the bit to decide if it is
> allowed to inline some functions (such as '+', 'car', ...) but I no
> longer think that would be the right way.
Wouldn't that imply that certain functions will never be 'generic' ?
Ralf
> Also, it would be needed for dumb variables when there are no separate
> setter and getter flags, but I think we should have these two flags.
>
> So let's forget about the read-only bit for now, I'd say.
>
> --
> GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
- Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/13
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, tomas, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables,
rm <=
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/14
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Lynn Winebarger, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Rob Browning, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, rm, 2002/08/15
- Re: Smart variables, dumb variables, Marius Vollmer, 2002/08/15