[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing. |
Date: |
02 Jun 2001 21:02:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Instead of reversing, you recurse. I'd say that this is actually
> > worse than reversing... ;>
>
> So what's the problem with recursion?
It eats stack, which is a more finite resource than heap for Guile.
More theoretically, it can't be as easily optimized into a real loop.
> I got fairly heavy indoctrination into the "always use recursion and
> expect the implementation to optimize for that case" (stream-style)
> school of scheme programming starting out, but is that a bad idea
> with guile?
No, not worse than with other Scheme implementations, I'd say.
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., (continued)
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/01
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/01
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/01
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Rob Browning, 2001/06/01
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/01
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Rob Browning, 2001/06/02
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/02
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Rob Browning, 2001/06/02
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Rob Browning, 2001/06/02
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/02
- Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Rob Browning, 2001/06/02
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing., Rob Browning, 2001/06/01