guile-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Guile-commits] 02/02: vm: Fix stack-marking bug in multi-threaded progr


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [Guile-commits] 02/02: vm: Fix stack-marking bug in multi-threaded programs.
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:03:06 -0400 (EDT)

civodul pushed a commit to branch stable-2.2
in repository guile.

commit 23af45e248e8e2bec99c712842bf24d6661abbe2
Author: Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>
Date:   Fri Jun 29 22:28:48 2018 +0200

    vm: Fix stack-marking bug in multi-threaded programs.
    
    Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/28211>.
    
    * libguile/vm-engine.c (call, call_label, handle_interrupts): Add
    'new_fp' variable; set the dynamic link and return address of the frame
    at NEW_FP before setting 'vp->fp'.  This fixes a bug whereby, in a
    multi-threaded context, the stack-marking code could run after vp->fp
    has been set but before its dynamic link has been set, leading the
    stack-walking code in 'scm_i_vm_mark_stack' to exit early on.
---
 libguile/vm-engine.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libguile/vm-engine.c b/libguile/vm-engine.c
index 1aa4e96..19ff3e4 100644
--- a/libguile/vm-engine.c
+++ b/libguile/vm-engine.c
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
   VM_DEFINE_OP (1, call, "call", OP2 (X8_F24, X8_C24))
     {
       scm_t_uint32 proc, nlocals;
-      union scm_vm_stack_element *old_fp;
+      union scm_vm_stack_element *old_fp, *new_fp;
 
       UNPACK_24 (op, proc);
       UNPACK_24 (ip[1], nlocals);
@@ -556,9 +556,10 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
       PUSH_CONTINUATION_HOOK ();
 
       old_fp = vp->fp;
-      vp->fp = SCM_FRAME_SLOT (old_fp, proc - 1);
-      SCM_FRAME_SET_DYNAMIC_LINK (vp->fp, old_fp);
-      SCM_FRAME_SET_RETURN_ADDRESS (vp->fp, ip + 2);
+      new_fp = SCM_FRAME_SLOT (old_fp, proc - 1);
+      SCM_FRAME_SET_DYNAMIC_LINK (new_fp, old_fp);
+      SCM_FRAME_SET_RETURN_ADDRESS (new_fp, ip + 2);
+      vp->fp = new_fp;
 
       RESET_FRAME (nlocals);
 
@@ -586,7 +587,7 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
     {
       scm_t_uint32 proc, nlocals;
       scm_t_int32 label;
-      union scm_vm_stack_element *old_fp;
+      union scm_vm_stack_element *old_fp, *new_fp;
 
       UNPACK_24 (op, proc);
       UNPACK_24 (ip[1], nlocals);
@@ -595,9 +596,10 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
       PUSH_CONTINUATION_HOOK ();
 
       old_fp = vp->fp;
-      vp->fp = SCM_FRAME_SLOT (old_fp, proc - 1);
-      SCM_FRAME_SET_DYNAMIC_LINK (vp->fp, old_fp);
-      SCM_FRAME_SET_RETURN_ADDRESS (vp->fp, ip + 3);
+      new_fp = SCM_FRAME_SLOT (old_fp, proc - 1);
+      SCM_FRAME_SET_DYNAMIC_LINK (new_fp, old_fp);
+      SCM_FRAME_SET_RETURN_ADDRESS (new_fp, ip + 3);
+      vp->fp = new_fp;
 
       RESET_FRAME (nlocals);
 
@@ -3893,7 +3895,7 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
         NEXT (1);
 
       {
-        union scm_vm_stack_element *old_fp;
+        union scm_vm_stack_element *old_fp, *new_fp;
         size_t old_frame_size = FRAME_LOCALS_COUNT ();
         SCM proc = scm_i_async_pop (thread);
 
@@ -3907,9 +3909,10 @@ VM_NAME (scm_i_thread *thread, struct scm_vm *vp,
            handle-interrupts opcode to handle any additional
            interrupts.  */
         old_fp = vp->fp;
-        vp->fp = SCM_FRAME_SLOT (old_fp, old_frame_size + 1);
-        SCM_FRAME_SET_DYNAMIC_LINK (vp->fp, old_fp);
-        SCM_FRAME_SET_RETURN_ADDRESS (vp->fp, ip);
+        new_fp = SCM_FRAME_SLOT (old_fp, old_frame_size + 1);
+        SCM_FRAME_SET_DYNAMIC_LINK (new_fp, old_fp);
+        SCM_FRAME_SET_RETURN_ADDRESS (new_fp, ip);
+        vp->fp = new_fp;
 
         SP_SET (0, proc);
 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]