grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands i


From: Fu Wei
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: update the introduction of xen boot commands in docs/grub.texi
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 19:15:52 +0800

Hi Andrei,

On 26 February 2016 at 18:50, Andrei Borzenkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Fu Wei <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> address@hidden xen_module
>>>>>>
>>>>>> address@hidden Command xen_linux file [arguments]
>>>>>> -Load a dom0 kernel image for xen hypervisor at the booting process of 
>>>>>> xen.
>>>>>> address@hidden Command xen_module [--nounzip] file [arguments]
>>>>>> +Load a module for xen hypervisor at the booting process of xen.
>>>>>> The rest of the line is passed verbatim as the module command line.
>>>>>> +Each module will be identified by the order in which the modules are 
>>>>>> added.
>>>>>> +The 1st module: dom0 kernel image
>>>>>> +The 2nd module: dom0 ramdisk
>>>>>> +All subsequent modules: UNKNOW
>>>>>> @end deffn
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm ... from previous discussion I gathered that Xen can detect module
>>>>> type. What if there is no initrd for dom0? How can subsequent modules be
>>>>
>>>> Now , Xen detect module type by the order. (at least on ARM64).
>>>> I think i386 is using Multiboot(2) protocol, so maybe this order is
>>>> nothing to do with i386.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then we have obvious problem with your XSM patch 
>>> (http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43420) - XSM may land as the first module. 
>>> That's actually something to solve on Xen side I think. It's just that so 
>>> far we had just kernel and initrd, so that was non issue.
>>
>> Oh, did you mean Wei Liu's patch?
>>
>> I guess XSM may land as the third module (or the module after linux
>> kernel, if you don't have initrd)
>>
>> Yes, agree. (That's actually something to solve on Xen side)
>>
>> I guess xen can get xsm from a special initrd. so for now there is not
>> big problem on xsm.
>>
>> Please correct me if I misunderstand something. :-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Back to this patch, is that OK for you, or any suggestion?  Thanks !
>>
>
> Yes, as this is dedicated Xen loader we should document this mandatory
> order - first module must be kernel image, second module must be
> initrd. I do not think we need to mention possibility to load more
> than two modules until there is clear understanding how it can be done
> without initrd.

Great thanks for your review, I have updated and sent the v3 patchset,
Hope I understood your suggestion correctly, Please check.  :-)



-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]