[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined
From: |
Glenn Washburn |
Subject: |
Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Nov 2013 23:33:54 -0600 |
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 12:37:08 +0100
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 09.11.2013 05:11, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:42:43 -0600
> > Glenn Washburn <address@hidden> пишет:
> >
> >> On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 19:54:43 +0100
> >> Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 08.11.2013 19:42, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> >>>> Now, I'm getting this error while building. Bug in the awk
> >>>> script?
> >>>>
> >>>> cat syminfo.lst | sort | gawk
> >>>> -f ./grub.git/grub-core/genmoddep.awk
> >>>>> moddep.lst || (rm -f moddep.lst; exit 1) __stack_chk_fail in
> >>>>> regexp is
> >>>> not defined
> >>>>
> >>> What compiler do you use and which additional options did you
> >>> pass to it? It inserted this function call. We need either to
> >>> provide this function or inhibit compiler from emiting such calls.
> >>
> >> I'm using gcc 4.7 on Ubuntu from the ubuntu-toolchain-r/test ppa.
> >> I do see a reference to __stack_chk_fail at
> >> grub-core/efiemu/runtime/efiemu.c:192. It doesn't look like that
> >> file is generated. Perhaps that function was accidentally added
> >> to that file?
> >
> > It comes from using -fstack-protector GCC option. But configure
> > should have added -fno-stack-protector in this case.
> >
> > Could you check defaults using
> >
> > /path/to/your/gcc -Q --help=common
> >
> > whether it is active by default? Also whether -fno-stack-protector
> > was used during compilation?
> >
> You're right.
> @Glenn: can you tell us exact version of GRUB (e.g. git commit) and
> attach config.log?
I can confirm that adding -fno-stack-protector to CFLAGS allows the
compile to be successful. So it does indeed seem to be a problem with
the configure script.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, (continued)
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/08
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/11/09
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Glenn Washburn, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined,
Glenn Washburn <=
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Andrey Borzenkov, 2013/11/10
- Re: __stack_chk_fail in regexp is not defined, Glenn Washburn, 2013/11/10