[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Raid5 regression
|
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
Subject: |
Re: Raid5 regression |
|
Date: |
Wed, 04 May 2011 17:21:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110402 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.9 |
On 04.05.2011 17:09, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Something has gone wrong with the disk size detection. Grub thinks
> the size of the disk is 488396800 sectors instead of the 488397168
> that fdisk reports. This shorter size causes the partition to appear
> to run right up to the end of the disk and thus, the raid superblock
> is found both at the end of the disk and the end of the partition.
>
Does it happen with grub-fstest ? Some BIOSes are known to chop away
some sectors in the end of disk.
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Jérôme Poulin, 2011/05/03
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2011/05/04
- Re: Raid5 regression, Phillip Susi, 2011/05/05
- Re: Raid5 regression, Goswin von Brederlow, 2011/05/05