[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon
|
From: |
Phillip Susi |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:45:42 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
On 9/28/2010 12:36 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> My branch uses every available sector for redundancy info. So if you
> have 2*n sectors left in MBR gap you can survive n corrupted sectors.
You might want to place a reasonable limit on that. With conventional
62 sector gaps this could be a good idea, but with everyone moving to 1
MB gaps these days, over 2000 sectors of ecc could be overkill ;)
- [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/25
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Lennart Sorensen, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon,
Phillip Susi <=
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Manoel Rebelo Abraches, 2010/09/27