Re: Big Endian fix patch

[Doug Nazar]

 On 2010-07-28 2:49 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> mdadm: device 1 in /dev/md/0 has wrong state in superblock, but /dev/sdb2 seems
Ok, I think this is a bug in mdadm. I couldn't replicate it on a x86 box 
but then tried it in the ppc image and it got the same message. Not sure 
if it's because of an endian issue or version issue my x86 boxes have 
version 3.1.2 while the Ubuntu ppc is running 2.6.7.1.

The error seems kinda strange as devices are 0 numbered so sdb2 is 
probably device 1 (I assume sda2 is device 0). Unfortunately the mdadm 
source has half a dozen structs with the same members so it's almost 
impossible to grep for where things are. It looks like that error 
happens when it's detecting if the drives are in the right roles. 
There's a __cpu_to_le32 that seems suspicious to me (super1.c:676).

What version of mdadm do you have?

> That's the first raid1.
The superblocks are correct.

Doug