|
From: | edgar . soldin |
Subject: | Re: Is it possible to have grub2's boot.img as my MBR, but have it look in a separate partition for core.img? |
Date: | Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:41:25 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
Any reason why you keep this of list?Well, in case of boot code size does matter as boot records are limited in size. Or? .. ede
On 28.01.2010 18:36, Bean wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:15 AM,<address@hidden> wrote:So grubinst bootcode seems superior over grub2 bootcode regarding partitions?Hi, Actually they both have advantages. Assembly is hard to write and maintain, but much smaller, C is larger but portable. In cases where size is not a matter, it's better to use C code.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |