[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] nested partitions
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] nested partitions |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:52:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:31:35AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> When you hide complexity from the user, the user doesn't generally care or
> want to understand what this involves. When we accept "(hd0,1)" from the
> user, it implies we know what's the partition label in hd0, but reality is
> that we're just guessing. User, however, will expect things to "just work",
> and if they fail will blame it on GRUB. This is what I refer to when I
> speak of burden.
Btw, I forgot to mention that initially GRUB took a very different approach:
labels were considered arch-specific, so on i386-pc you only had msdos labels,
on powerpc-ieee1275 you only had apple labels, etc. With this approach, the
probing problem doesn't exist.
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi
Re: [PATCH] nested partitions, Seth Goldberg, 2010/01/22