[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Tagged mbi
|
From: |
Robert Millan |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Tagged mbi |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:08:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:12:51PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
wrote:
> Hello. Currently mbi contains a lot of pointers and substructures. It's
> has various problems like:
> -Unused fields occupy space if any subsequent fields is used.
> -Difficult to relocate since it may be spilled all over the memory
> -It's unstraightforward to e.g. specify 2 framebuffers
Seems like there's a problem indeed.
> I propose to use tagged MBI.
Can you provide a short explanation on this proposed solution? You explained
the problem, but not the solution.
--
Robert Millan
"Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi