[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Etherboot-developers] gPXE and GRUB2
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [Etherboot-developers] gPXE and GRUB2 |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:46:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:03:51PM +0100, Thomas Miletich wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Robert Millan <address@hidden> wrote:
> > If he followed the instructions in http://grub.enbug.org/PXEBOOT it is
> > to be expected that GRUB only starts in rescue mode, because that's what
> > the selection of modules in that page provides.
> >
> > I don't think there's anything wrong in either gPXE or GRUB; perhaps the
> > wiki page :-)
>
> Loading the same GRUB 2 file that fails with gPXE works with a vendor
> PXE rom. GRUB tries to fetch the file normal.mod over tftp, which gPXE
> does. It fails to load normal.mod and goes to rescue mode then. It
> doesn't fall back to rescue mode with a vendor PXE.
> There are more details in the follow-up mails to
> http://etherboot.org/pipermail/gpxe/2009-November/000008.html
Ah, I see. Well, as I said in previous mail, our support for using PXE
callbacks is a temporary hack. Our long-term goal is to replace it
completely with standalone free drivers.
So in this case, we'd use gPXE all the same but with a more efficient (and
less error-prone) interface :-)
That said, we're still going to carry with legacy support for a while, so
if someone wants to debug this and figure out what's wrong, that'd be most
welcome.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."