[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC
From: |
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:08:34 +0200 |
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:26 AM, David Miller<address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Yves Blusseau <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:30:01 +0200
>
>>
>> Le 1 sept. 09 à 17:43, Bean a écrit :
>>
>>> IMO, if we are to tackle the NESTED_FUNC_ATTR issue, we should do it
>>> properly by removing nested function, this also has other advantages,
>>> like allowing to run tools on systems like OSX that doesn't allow to
>>> execute code in stack by default.
>>
>> Agree with Bean, it's the last "issue" that made that we can't run
>> tool on OSX directly.
>
> I agree too, fixing the root issue would be a much better
> cure for this rather than alienating everyone who happens
> to be using older tools on their computer.
>
I can't agree with designating nested functions as root issue. Imagine
tomorrow we discover a bug in "for" loop compiling. This wouldn't be a
reason to replace all "for"s with "while"s. The root issue is compiler
bug and it should be fixed
The root issue is a compil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Bean, 2009/09/02
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Robert Millan, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Felix Zielcke, 2009/09/03
Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/09/03