[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload
From: |
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:01:06 +0200 |
>
> Hmm. You seem to be right, on investigation (I'd missed the fact that
> the 32-bit boot protocol skips a whole bunch of initialisation code),
> but in that case I'm thoroughly confused about why setting it made any
> difference at all in my tests. Back to the drawing board, I guess.
>
> (It's not actually quite true that vid_mode isn't used *at all* with the
> 32-bit boot protocol; it's still saved for use with ACPI sleep.)
>
>> Does 0x0F04 really do something when used in combination with Linux' vesafb?
>
> It seems to be 16-bit boot protocol only. I withdraw this patch for the
> time being as I'm obviously confused.
If these numbers are still needed it needs to be uniform between
gfxpayload=1024x768 or gfxpayload=keep + gfxmode=1024x768. Derive the
number from video mode information if you really need it
>
> --
> Colin Watson address@hidden
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git
- Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload, (continued)
Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/10
Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/10
Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload, Robert Millan, 2009/08/10
Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload, Robert Millan, 2009/08/11