[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch
From: |
Bean |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:06:33 +0800 |
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think it's OK to apply your patch, unless there are other objections.
> Perhaps it's even better to apply the patch without the "cd" alias, so
> that the aliases can be implemented separately in a more generic way.
Yes, i have similar feelings. The hard coded (cd0) alias seems like a
dirty hack to me.
--
Bean
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Bean, 2008/03/14
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Bean, 2008/03/14
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/03/14
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Bean, 2008/03/15
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/03/15
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Bean, 2008/03/15
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Christian Franke, 2008/03/15
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Pavel Roskin, 2008/03/17
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Bean, 2008/03/17
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Pavel Roskin, 2008/03/19
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch,
Bean <=
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Bean, 2008/03/24
- Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Christian Franke, 2008/03/14
[PATCH] cdrom access patch, Kalamatee, 2008/03/06
Re: [PATCH] cdrom access patch, Kalamatee, 2008/03/08