[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: netboot/UNDI status
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: netboot/UNDI status |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:42:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:49:22AM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2008 16:46, Douglas Ward wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > >> But to be honest, there are more important issues than networking in
> > >> the short term...
> > >
> > > ACK. Let's focus on what GRUB excels at, instead of trying to compete
> > > with etherboot just yet...
> >
> > actually what i need isn't something that competes with etherboot/gpxe
> > but something that competes with pxelinux.
>
> I hate using the word "compete". There is no fact that we are competitors.
> Their targets are simply different, and we have been collaborating with
> etherboot/gpxe.
Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver collection that's even
better, of course. This was done for GRUB Legacy, right?
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
- netboot/UNDI status, Douglas Ward, 2008/01/21
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/25
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/25
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/25