[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing on PowerMac G4
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Testing on PowerMac G4 |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jan 2008 02:27:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Thursday 03 January 2008 16:28, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >> Linux style description. The first line is the synopsis. If it
> >> doesn't fit 72 characters, the patch is a candidate for splitting.
> >> Then an empty line. Then a more detailed description of the patch,
> >> including the motivation behind the changes. The list of the affected
> >> files can be generated by the version control system.
> >
> > Looks good. But I guess you'll have to convince Marco and Okuji
> > about this :-)
>
> Sure, it's in my TODO list :)
I do not think automatically generated logs can be as precise as being made by
human.
Anyway, there is no reason that you shouldn't write a detailed description in
ChangeLog. Indeed, I myself sometimes do that, when I make a big change or
something hard to understand.
Okuji
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, (continued)
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/03
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/03
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/05
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/05
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/04
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/05
- Re: Testing on PowerMac G4, Robert Millan, 2008/01/05