[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fs/fat.c assumes that 0UL is the same for 32bit and 64bit archs
|
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
|
Subject: |
Re: fs/fat.c assumes that 0UL is the same for 32bit and 64bit archs |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:01:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 09:56, Omniflux wrote:
> fs/fat.c assumes that 0UL is the same for 32bit and 64bit archs, but
> it is not.
>
> There are four locations in fs/fat.c where a 32bit unsigned int is
> set equal to 0UL. This causes warnings when compiling on 64bit
> architectures as 0UL is 0xffffffffffffffff (64bits) there.
Marco, did you look at this patch?
Okuji
- Re: fs/fat.c assumes that 0UL is the same for 32bit and 64bit archs,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=