[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff"

From: Peter Schaffter
Subject: Re: [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff"
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:56:10 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017, Gour wrote:
> Let me say that the reason to loook (again) at groff was the fact that Pandoc
> got support for creating groff output as stated in its release notes:
> "New output format ms (groff ms). Complete support, including tables, math,
> syntax highlighting, and PDF bookmarks. The writer uses texmath’s new eqn
> writer to convert math to eqn format, so a ms file produced with this writer
> should be processed with groff -ms -e if it contains math."
> but I'm still not clear whether it means one can use mom package as well?

Not with Pandoc.

Peter Schaffter

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]