groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Potential buffer overrun in src/roff/troff/input.cpp


From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: [Groff] Potential buffer overrun in src/roff/troff/input.cpp
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 06:57:35 +0200 (CEST)

> I've identified a potential buffer overrun in the above file; [...]

Thanks for catching this.

> Okay to commit?

Please go on.

> I believe I've matched the existing style of code layout, (which
> isn't entirely to my personal taste), but is the comment style
> acceptable?  (I've annotated my changes considerably more
> comprehensively than the original).

I don't really mind, since it isn't consistent in the groff source.
However, as far as I can see, you are adding *another* style, and I
wonder whether there is a specific reason...  Personally, I prefer
`//' due to its uniform look.

> +static
> +/**********

This I don't like.  Please move the `static' keyword below the
comment.

> + * Returns (+ve) number of input characters stored into caller's

What is `+ve'?


    Werner



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]