[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal
|
From: |
Vaibhaw Pandey |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:58:10 +0530 |
Should we be worried about having too few characters left though? Do we
need to work on a solution?
- Vaibhaw
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed.
> >
> > Only once the preprocessor has a significant enough audience to make
> > it worthwhile? Meanwhile, it can continue to be explicitly
> > pipelined?
>
> Given that `ideal' is a traditional preprocessor, I think it is a good
> thing to assign a shortcut.
>
>
> Werner
>
>