[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal

From: Vaibhaw Pandey
Subject: Re: [Groff] groff variable for ideal
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:58:10 +0530

Should we be worried about having too few characters left though? Do we
need to work on a solution?

- Vaibhaw

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:

> >> A `groff' option for running the `gideal' preprocessor is needed.
> >
> > Only once the preprocessor has a significant enough audience to make
> > it worthwhile?  Meanwhile, it can continue to be explicitly
> > pipelined?
> Given that `ideal' is a traditional preprocessor, I think it is a good
> thing to assign a shortcut.
>     Werner

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]