Re: [Groff] `groff_char.7' works only for `man', but not for `groff'

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> I suggest that grog accepts
>>
>>   .\" t
>>
>> under protest only, this is, it emits a warning that the line should
>> be changed to
>>
>>   '\" t
>
> The protest of grog will come later.

Thanks.

> Now grog accepts not only the 4 characters, but all 8 from groff's
> options.  That will not hurt anything.

Well, yes, but currently only `man' interprets this comment, and `man'
exclusively wants a leading ' and nothing else...

> How about handling this feature also for other roff files?

What exactly do you mean?


    Werner