[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX

From: Michael Witten
Subject: Re: [Groff] Eric Raymond on groff and TeX
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 17:19:39 +0000

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Tadziu Hoffmann
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> Macros come closer to "structural", but really aren't.
> I disagree.  There is no principal difference between
>  All your base
>  .EMPH are
>  belong to us!
> and
>  All your base <emphasis>are</emphasis> belong to us!
> It's a purely a matter of syntax, not intent.

That's because your example is cherry-picked and disingenuous (or naive).

Structure implies abstraction, which implies a directed acyclic graph
of concepts.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]