Re: [Groff] Unformatted diversion?

[Werner LEMBERG]

> Is there a way to define a diversion that just works raw?

If you define a macro, you get something unformatted.

> If the above is possible, then is it possible too that my macro
> seeing a parameter can decide that this must be a file name or the
> name of a macro (that contains my raw material)?

Please provide a real-case example, this is, please show what you want
to input and what you expect as output.  This makes it much easier for
me to think about a solution.


    Werner