[Groff] Re: New PS font definition files

[Werner LEMBERG]

> But if AGL 2.0 is sacred

More or less, yes :-)

> and the correction is an evil (but necessary) hack - it is logical
> to change textmap, with additional benefit of double entries in
> groff font description (for both u2206 and u0394).

OK, let's go this route.  May I ask you to provide a patch for
groff_char.man (and/or grops.man) also which documents this?  Or maybe
you find a better place for documentation.


    Werner