[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: New PS font definition files
From: |
Michail Vidiassov |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: New PS font definition files |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:04:32 +0300 (MSK) |
Dear Werner,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Delta u0394
Omega u03A9
mu u03BC
Delta u2206
Omega u2126
mu u00B5
Honestly, I don't know whether it's better to change textmap or
afmtodit. What do you prefer?
I am also almost indifferent.
But since we are correcting a bug originating in the glyphlist
is seems to be kosher to patch as near to is as possible - at
the afmtodit.tables level.
But if AGL 2.0 is sacred and the correction is an evil (but necessary) hack
- it is logical to change textmap, with additional benefit of double
entries in groff font description (for both u2206 and u0394).
Sincerely, Michail
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Michail Vidiassov, 2007/01/03
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/03
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Michail Vidiassov, 2007/01/05
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/05
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Michail Vidiassov, 2007/01/06
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/06
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files,
Michail Vidiassov <=
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/07
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Michail Vidiassov, 2007/01/09
- [Groff] Re: New PS font definition files, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/10