Re: [Groff] SGR

[Alejandro López-Valencia]

On 10/18/05, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > I knew making SGR the default would bite back with a vengeance
[snip]
>
> I still think it was the right choice inspite of all warnings.  On the
> other hand, most documentation systems seem to prefer HTML today
> (which isn't my personal favourite), so it doesn't matter much...

Presently I think that SGR as the default wasn't a bad idea after all.
And I agree with you. HTML is not my favorite either.

Hmm.... I wonder if instead of talking about a graphical WYSIWYWYWG
(what-you-see-is-what-you wish-you-would-get) tool, wouldn't be better
to promote the use of troff (or some of the macro packages) as an
output target for XML transform tools such as Open Jade and OpenSP...

--
Alejandro López-Valencia