[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Using C with glib instead of C++ for groff
From: |
Robert Suetterlin |
Subject: |
[Groff] Using C with glib instead of C++ for groff |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:26:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Hi,
what's the topic here? 32 bit Integers? Or C++ use of
namespaces? Or I18N?
If the problem is ``groff uses static instead of namespace'' why not
change the 2.0 code to use namespaces? The time of C++ compilers that
don't know how to handle namespaces is over (really!).
If the problem is ``we need an 32 bit Integer'' (I really wonder where
such a constraint derives from) why not solve it in the configure
script. If it is a question of ``efficient Integer Type with at least
32 bit'' then there should be a small piece of software that implements
just the inner loop and can be timed depending on all available integer
types with the necessary bit width.
I cannot see any point for using ``glib'' to solve any of the above
questions.
Sincerely, Robert S.
--
Robert Suetterlin (address@hidden)
phone: (+49)89 / 30000-3546 fax: (+49)89 / 30000-3950
Re: [Groff] Using C with glib instead of C++ for groff, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/11/28
Re: [Groff] Using C with glib instead of C++ for groff, Antoine Leca, 2002/11/30
[Groff] Using C with glib instead of C++ for groff,
Robert Suetterlin <=