groff-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[groff] 22/26: doc/groff.texi: Fix error in example description.


From: G. Branden Robinson
Subject: [groff] 22/26: doc/groff.texi: Fix error in example description.
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 22:04:30 -0500 (EST)

gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.

commit 72780e21973d9aaad0d2d62de1fd8b1da6004d73
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat Nov 13 18:47:45 2021 +1100

    doc/groff.texi: Fix error in example description.
    
    Problem introduced by me in commit 88cbc3f2, 9 November.
---
 doc/groff.texi | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/groff.texi b/doc/groff.texi
index 5b67410..742006b 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi
+++ b/doc/groff.texi
@@ -5823,9 +5823,9 @@ the beginning of an input line;@footnote{Control 
structure syntax
 creates an exception to this rule, but is designed to remain useful:
 recalling our example, @samp{.if 1 .Underline this} would underline only
 ``this'', precisely.  @xref{Conditionals and Loops}.} if the @code{|}
-operator were omitted, then the underline would be drawn to the
-beginning of the @emph{output} line, where many words might precede the
-macro argument.
+operator were omitted, then the underline would be drawn a zero distance
+from the current position, producing device-dependent, and likely
+undesirable, results.
 
 @codequotebacktick off
 @codequoteundirected off



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]