[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpsd hardware with RTK support?
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: gpsd hardware with RTK support? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 19:28:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) |
"Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com> writes:
>> MaCORS can send on various mountpoints (for carrier phase, omitting
>> CMR):
>>
>> RTCM 3.x (Extended) : GPS/GLO only
>> RTCM 3.x (MSM4) : GPS/GLO/GAL/BDS including GPS L5
>
> Only MSM4? Sad.
I have not found info that really makes the case that MSM7 is better in
practice.
>> I am using MaCORS which is
>> Leica and I go into FIX very easily (given good sky view) and have
>> observed 4 cm repeatability when occupying the same mark days later.
>
> 4cm not that great these days.
For F9P, $100-class antenna and RTK where the reference receivers are in
the 25 km range, vs 500m, I think it is. People quote theoretical
accuracies all the time, and I'm talking about actually making repeat
measurements on a real mark with some tree cover. At this degree of
accuracy you need to be careful about leveling; I was hand-holding a
prism pole with a bubble level.
I would be very interested to see similar data from others, doing:
establish some point that you can return to
measure it with RTK (and a prism pole or tripod) once, with a 30s
average, and compute the mean with qgis etc.
several days later, do it again, wait a few more days, do it a third
time
talk about the extreme spread of the 3 measurements, longest side of
the triangle. Explain the RTK reference source, leveling method, and
antenna.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature