Re: [gpsd-users] SemPiTernal - Bounding PPS uncertainty

[Chen Wei]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 05:00:01AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:26:43AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Beside the capture-clear patch Gary submitted, I think the pps-gpio
> > module needs a parameter to better determine assert-rising or falling;
> > it also will be nice to specify gpio pin as module parameter.
>
> Are you in a position to push this on LKML? Gary reports not being able to
> get them to move on his patch.

No, I am not. I had written the assert-rising and pin number parameter
patch for kernel 3.4 though. It had not been accepted.


-- 
Chen Wei