[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gpsd-users] EXT :Re: leapsecond cache

From: Kuhn, Thomas J (IS)
Subject: Re: [gpsd-users] EXT :Re: leapsecond cache
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 18:52:55 +0000


Yep I sure did miss 3.16!  Yes everything there worked correctly and all tests 
passed.  Thanks again.  Now I will just work on getting it cross compiled.  I 
am sure I will post another question here in the near future.

Tom Kuhn 
Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
Office: (407) 737-4953 
Cell: (407) 721-0628 

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary E. Miller [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 1:38 PM
To: Kuhn, Thomas J (IS)
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: EXT :Re: [gpsd-users] leapsecond cache

Yo Thomas J (IS)!

On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:20:16 +0000
"Kuhn, Thomas J (IS)" <address@hidden> wrote:

> In the long run I will be trying to build gpsd 3.15 for arm using the 
> gsourcery compiler, but before I get to that point I just want to try 
> and build it on the native machine (Ubuntu 15.10).

3.16 is the current release, and has some bug fixes in it.

> I am trying to build gpsd on Ubuntu 15.10.  It looks like everything 
> builds but I get the  10 failed "scons test" results that indicate 
> (according to that the 
> leapsecond did not get updated.

After building you should have a file called leapseconds.cache.  Today the 
contents should look like this:

    315532800       # 1979-12-31T23:59:60
    362793599       # 1981-06-30T23:59:59
    394329599       # 1982-06-30T23:59:59
    425865599       # 1983-06-30T23:59:59
    489023999       # 1985-06-30T23:59:59
    567993600       # 1987-12-31T23:59:60
    631152000       # 1989-12-31T23:59:60
    662688000       # 1990-12-31T23:59:60
    709948799       # 1992-06-30T23:59:59
    741484799       # 1993-06-30T23:59:59
    773020799       # 1994-06-30T23:59:59
    820454400       # 1995-12-31T23:59:60
    867715199       # 1997-06-30T23:59:59
    915148800       # 1998-12-31T23:59:60
    1136073600      # 2005-12-31T23:59:60
    1230768000      # 2008-12-31T23:59:60
    1341100799      # 2012-06-30T23:59:59
    1435708799      # 2015-06-30T23:59:59

> How can I tell if the leapsecondcache was updated? And if it was why 
> the failures on the tests?  Does it really matter if those specific
> 10 tests fail?

Which 10 tests fail?  Do they fail on 3.16?  Some test errors are just rounding 
errors and can be ignored.

Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        address@hidden  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]