[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-users] Will proprietary NMEA extensions be included in gpsd?
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-users] Will proprietary NMEA extensions be included in gpsd? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:15:42 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) |
"Gary E. Miller" <address@hidden> writes:
> PORZD is an odd thing: "RMS error of plane coordinates.
>
> Why not use the standard sentences for reporting errors? GPGGA and
> GPGLL aklready provide the HDOP which is more useful than the RMS error
> of the PORZD. GPDOP provides PDOP, HDOP and VDOP.
RMS error is quite different from HDOP. It's perhaps HDOP * UERE or
something, so I can see your point that this is gratuitous. Surely
it's computed, so arguably it isn't that useful if the other things are
reported.
pgpQMcyUZ6oyi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gpsd-users] Will proprietary NMEA extensions be included in gpsd?, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/06/25